Official Organizations

[StrawHatSeyi]

There are many organizations as it it, and I know the number of organizations will keep growing. So, to stop this over population of orgs. There should be a list of official organisation and unofficial. Official orgs are the pegs with 10 numbers or more. Unofficial are the ones with less that 10. This will sieve out all the dead orgs.

[Konohuro]

I can say that Jyuunishin is "more official" than Kami or others as it has 100% active members even if it has only 3 pages. It is an organization that doesn't need 100 pages as it has only a few available seats. Quality=quantity as important(or official, how you like to call it)=quality, my friend.

[StrawHatSeyi]

@Konohuro  , you don't get it. It doesn't matter about forum posts or active members. I'm talking about, if there are 20 orgs that have been dead and/or not active for a year, they are not official. I'm talking about active orgs, not active members

[Mars]

So you're saying if people don't want to join an org, that org is dead?

[Kayleb]

I see where Seyi is coming from, but I don't completely agree with your idea of squad members. It shouldn't matter whether the org is dead or not, it's still an org. That organisation can be made more active or less active whenever the people in it see fit. If the five best players in the game decided to make an organisation together and managed to destroy the other organisations, by your logic it doesn't matter, as they've only got 5 members, even if they're one of the strongest organisations in the game. So no, I don't think that organisations should be confirmed "dead" at any point, it's up to the people inside them to do what they want in them.

[rayzote]

Why would you do that, the members of an organization can increase in numbers when DM comes out. This would only be something inforum.

[StrawHatSeyi]

So you're saying if people don't want to join an org, that org is dead?

No mars, it means that org is unofficial



The top option will contain all orgs that are official, active and doing well.
The bottom one will contain all the orgs starting out or unofficial (meaning less than 10 members, unactive)

[Konohuro]

So... for e.g. my guild: Yokubo.
It will be classified as unofficial. The leader and it's members are inactive except me, the one that has the permission to recruit new members. Besides the fact that our org. is small, any chance of getting new people will be taken from us because we are classified as unofficial and none will check those therads. Does this seem fair?

[Mars]

So... for e.g. my guild: Yokubo.
It will be classified as unofficial. The leader and it's members are inactive except me, the one that has the permission to recruit new members. Besides the fact that our org. is small, any chance of getting new people will be taken from us because we are classified as unofficial and none will check those therads. Does this seem fair?

[StrawHatSeyi]

You will still be an organization kono obviously. But you have to accept the fact that it isn't that active. You have tht power to recruit members, so when you get above 10 the. It will be official. My opinions Soz for any offence

[Konohuro]

Not that I am hurt or something, but I don't see the point of this.

[StrawHatSeyi]

It separates the active orgs from the orgs that aren't active or even dead. And from the people that only came on came on forums once and made an org.

[Mars]

It separates the active orgs from the orgs that aren't active or even dead. And from the people that only came on came on forums once and made an org.

That's different.
Maybe if all members were inactive for 1 year+, maybe this might be an acceptable idea.

[json243]

Well, thats going to be hard for orgs such as 11 ronin and such where there are only 11 people. You need to rethink this seyi. Its activeness, not amount of people.

[StrawHatSeyi]

True json, good point