I am aware of what Vreg said. That is why i posted early on in this thread of how i feel the combat speed should work. I stated earlier we can agree to disagree. So let us do that on move on Who knows? Maybe Vreg will implement something entirely different to anything currently in this topic.

Yes, that would definitely help Straw. But, if Vreg is right in his assumption of thousands of players, then even if everyone could only play 2 traps or so( just an example), that would still be a lot of traps on the ground  

I guess we can agree to disagree on how realistic the game should be Xendrus You made a comparison to players being killed while unmoving to a high calibur sniper blowing off a person's limbs. I remember seeing it, whether you claim it was there or not. Anyhow, if you wish to continue down talking me, then by all means do so. Just keep in mind, that it is not making you any more convincing and it doesn't help you with your case.

Good job editing out the sniper part I see you understand the basics of using a forum. I see most of your argument is embedded in trying to insult me. If you cannot reply without the use of insults then I don't see you holding a very stable position in this argument. I was only rude when you began to insult me and my post. So please reread your posts. If you wish for a more realistic game than please by all means go buy and download Sims 3. My comments about the movement speed of shinobi's are obviously unrelated to the "In combat maximum speed" topic board. Please stop trying to flame with information that is incorrect and misdirected. You are indeed making yourself look like a fool.

@Marius If they are skilled enough to kill you, then why even have a scenario in which you can no longer move? They are apparently capable of killing you off by being more skilled than you. So what happens if you both reach 5%? Are you both to sit there "practically dead" until some stranger so happens to stroll past your unmoving bodies? What if you all are evenly matched and one person is at 6% and the other at 5%? Is it fair for one of you to just suddenly lose all movement so the person with 6% can finish you off?

Quote from: Raenir on January 27, 2015, 21:13:04

Quote from: Xendrus... ~Nerd on January 27, 2015, 20:30:23

My statement still stands.

It's a realistic simulation.
Realistic simulation.
Realistic.
Real

gg wreckd

It's a realistic simulation of NARUTO. Not everyday life. Secondly, just because you are close to death doesn't mean your legs suddenly lose functionality. You can still move around. Maybe you wont be running, but even in real life, since you seem to be pretty hooked on "Realistic", you aren't moving 1 km/h. If you get stabbed in the stomach you're going to move as fast as you can. I think it is more unrealistic to move almost close to 0 just because your HP is low. Lastly for a game based off of skill, it would be stupid for someone to be killed by the fact that they can't move more than 1 km/h.

Yup. You're clearly ignorant on the topic. If you get stabbed in the stomach, depending on the length of the blade, two things will happen. Firstly, if the blade is short like most knives are when it comes to stabbing, you're right. You will be able to run away with blood coming from your probably lethal wound. If it's long enough, you most likely -will- die pretty quickly. If you die, you can't move.

When I say below 5% health, that means you are PRETTY MUCH DEAD. Not DYING. This means that you are past the point of just being stabbed with a knife. THIS MEANS YOU ARE ALMOST DEAD. If you are PRETTY MUCH DEAD, NO YOU CANNOT MOVE. After fighting a fight with blades and LETHAL ABILITIES you will not be able to move. You'd be bleeding out, internal bleeding... The physical abuse put on your body after fighting would simply be too much and you simply would not be able to move, if hardly at all.

Your statement is completely off the mark and illogical. And for a game based off of skill, if you reach the point of almost dead then your opponent is more skillful than you, you're going to lose anyways.

Just because the game is being based off of the Naruto Universe doesn't mean it's going to be unrealistic like Naruto is. It is a REALISTIC SIMULATION. End of discussion.

If there is no point to the last 5% of your HP, why even have it? If your HP is greater than 0, no matter how "PRETTY MUCH DEAD" you are, you are still ALIVE. If we are going by your "realistic" notions then i guess why even have HP? We are all going to die in one well placed hit because according to you "that's realistic". 

And how is the length of the blade a determinant of lethality? It really comes down to where you get stabbed. If you get stabbed in the arm with a 4 inch knife, or a 2 foot sword it doesn't matter how long the blade is. You got stabbed in the arm. You probably wont die. If you get stabbed in somewhere where you would die, ie your heart or something, then you're going to die no matter what. I think we can all assume at this point anyways, there will not be a system to identify where sword/kunai hits are landing on the body.

Your statement about being shot by a sniper is completely irrelevant to what i stated. My statement entails that if you are slowed to the point of no longer being able to move, then it obviously wouldn't require much skill to finish you off. I honestly don't see how your sniper statement ties into that whatsoever.

Lastly, whether it is based off of Naruto (which is an anime series, not real life and the game totally is), or a "REALISTIC SIMULATION", it is still a game and will of course have some "unrealistic" aspects to it. So if you wish for a completely realistic simulation, before insulting me and my post, maybe you can take a step outside of your house for once. Then you'll have your completely realistic world

Well it is not supposed to be some game changing mechanic. More of just something that could be situationally helpful.

Just out of curiosity, why would limiting how many of your items can be locked matter? It would have no effect on anybody or anything if you had 5 items or 20 items locked. If anything, you would be hindering yourself with the more items you lock.

Well if this is to be implemented, then there should definitely be a way to deactivate the bomb, or at least be able to detect them before walking through them. If not, you could just lay as many as you'd like all around where ever you so desire. And no one can do anything about it except blow up on them. That would be silly and over powered.